What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Tijuca National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 130th most-seen of the 214 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Tijuca National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Tijuca National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
9th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Palm Tanager (about 80%), Bananaquit (about 80%) and Sayaca Tanager (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-vented Conebill is recorded against all the birds logged in Tijuca National Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.