What are the chances of seeing a Glittering-bellied Emerald in Tijuca National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Glittering-bellied Emerald sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 152nd most-seen of the 214 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Glittering-bellied Emerald in Tijuca National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Glittering-bellied Emerald in Tijuca National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Glittering-bellied Emerald?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Glittering-bellied Emerald sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Glittering-bellied Emerald?
14th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Glittering-bellied Emerald sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 50%), El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 40%) and El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Glittering-bellied Emerald live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Trochilidae
The closest relatives of the Glittering-bellied Emerald that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Trochilidae, Hummingbirds) are Swallow-tailed Hummingbird (about 60%) and Violet-capped Woodnymph (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Glittering-bellied Emerald sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Glittering-bellied Emerald is recorded against all the birds logged in Tijuca National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.