What are the chances of seeing an Indian Roller in Udawalawe National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report an Indian Roller sighting in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, based on 186 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 166 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Indian Roller in Udawalawe National Park?
March
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report an Indian Roller in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, against about 20% in August and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Indian Roller?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Indian Roller sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Udawalawe National Park the best place to see an Indian Roller?
4th of 20
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Indian Roller sightings, Udawalawe National Park ranks 4th at about 40%. The best odds are in Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 60%), Kanha National Park (India, about 60%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Indian Roller live in Udawalawe National Park?
Same order: Coraciiformes
The closest relatives of the Indian Roller that you can see in Udawalawe National Park (order Coraciiformes, Rollers, Kingfishers, and Allies) are Asian Green Bee-eater (about 90%), White-throated Kingfisher (about 70%) and Blue-tailed Bee-eater (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Indian Roller sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Indian Roller is recorded against all the birds logged in Udawalawe National Park (186 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.