What are the chances of seeing a Spectacled Weaver in Virunga National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Spectacled Weaver sighting in Virunga National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 316 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Spectacled Weaver in Virunga National Park?
May–June and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Spectacled Weaver in Virunga National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Spectacled Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Spectacled Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Virunga National Park the best place to see a Spectacled Weaver?
29th of 36
Of the 36 parks where we can rate Spectacled Weaver sightings, Virunga National Park ranks 29th at under 5%. The best odds are in uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 40%), Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 30%) and iSimangaliso Wetland Park (South Africa, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Spectacled Weaver live in Virunga National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Spectacled Weaver that you can see in Virunga National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Village Weaver (about 20%), Baglafecht Weaver (about 20%) and Black-headed Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Spectacled Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Spectacled Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Virunga National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.