What are the chances of seeing a Green-winged Pytilia in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Green-winged Pytilia sighting in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, based on 66 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 22nd most-seen of the 118 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green-winged Pytilia in Waterberg Plateau Park?
August
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Green-winged Pytilia in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, against about 20% in November, the lowest month. That is one of Waterberg Plateau Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 110 mm in January. April and June have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Green-winged Pytilia?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green-winged Pytilia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Waterberg Plateau Park the best place to see a Green-winged Pytilia?
2nd of 36
Of the 36 parks where we can rate Green-winged Pytilia sightings, Waterberg Plateau Park ranks 2nd at about 40%. The best odds are in Ruaha National Park (Tanzania, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Green-winged Pytilia live in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Same family: Estrildidae
The closest relatives of the Green-winged Pytilia that you can see in Waterberg Plateau Park (family Estrildidae, Waxbills and Allies) are Violet-eared Waxbill (about 30%), Blue-breasted Cordonbleu (about 30%) and Black-faced Waxbill (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green-winged Pytilia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green-winged Pytilia is recorded against all the birds logged in Waterberg Plateau Park (66 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.