What are the chances of seeing a Common Goldeneye in Yellowstone National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Common Goldeneye sighting in Yellowstone National Park on a given day, based on 260 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 118th most-seen of the 197 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Goldeneye in Yellowstone National Park?
January
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Common Goldeneye in Yellowstone National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Common Goldeneye?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Goldeneye sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yellowstone National Park the best place to see a Common Goldeneye?
32nd of 41
Of the 41 parks where we can rate Common Goldeneye sightings, Yellowstone National Park ranks 32nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 50%), Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 30%) and Isle Royale National Park (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Goldeneye live in Yellowstone National Park?
Same genus: Bucephala
The closest relatives of the Common Goldeneye that you can see in Yellowstone National Park (genus Bucephala, Goldeneyes and Bufflehead) are Barrow's Goldeneye (about 30%) and Bufflehead (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Goldeneye sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Goldeneye is recorded against all the birds logged in Yellowstone National Park (260 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.