What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-breasted Chat in Acadia National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-breasted Chat sighting in Acadia National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 235th most-seen of the 243 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-breasted Chat in Acadia National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-breasted Chat in Acadia National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-breasted Chat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-breasted Chat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Acadia National Park the best place to see a Yellow-breasted Chat?
31st of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Yellow-breasted Chat sightings, Acadia National Park ranks 31st at under 5%. The best odds are in Big Bend National Park (United States, about 20%), Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (Guatemala, about 10%) and Death Valley National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-breasted Chat live in Acadia National Park?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-breasted Chat that you can see in Acadia National Park (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Black-throated Green Warbler (about 40%), Yellow-rumped Warbler (about 30%) and Northern Parula (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-breasted Chat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-breasted Chat is recorded against all the birds logged in Acadia National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.