What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Motmot in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Motmot sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 395th most-seen of the 436 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Motmot in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Motmot in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Motmot?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Motmot sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Rufous Motmot?
16th of 20
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Rufous Motmot sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 30%) and Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Motmot live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same order: Coraciiformes
The closest relatives of the Rufous Motmot that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (order Coraciiformes, Rollers, Kingfishers, and Allies) are Ringed Kingfisher (about 30%), Amazon Kingfisher (about 20%) and Green Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Motmot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Motmot is recorded against all the birds logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.