What are the chances of seeing a Common Iora in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Common Iora sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 908 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 29th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Iora in Bandhavgarh National Park?
January
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Common Iora in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against about 20% in June, September and November, the lowest months. That is one of Bandhavgarh National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 400 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Common Iora?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Iora sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Common Iora?
7th of 40
Of the 40 parks where we can rate Common Iora sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 7th at about 40%. The best odds are in Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 70%), Bako National Park (Malaysia, about 70%) and Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Iora live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Common Iora that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Jungle Babbler (about 70%), Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 70%) and Large-billed Crow (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Iora sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Iora is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (908 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.