What are the chances of seeing a Common Goldeneye in Białowieża National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Common Goldeneye sighting in Białowieża National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 149th most-seen of the 182 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Goldeneye in Białowieża National Park?
March and June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Goldeneye in Białowieża National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May and July–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Common Goldeneye?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Goldeneye sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Białowieża National Park the best place to see a Common Goldeneye?
30th of 41
Of the 41 parks where we can rate Common Goldeneye sightings, Białowieża National Park ranks 30th at under 5%. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 50%), Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 30%) and Isle Royale National Park (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Goldeneye live in Białowieża National Park?
Same family: Anatidae
The closest relatives of the Common Goldeneye that you can see in Białowieża National Park (family Anatidae, Ducks, Geese, and Swans) are Mallard (about 50%), Greylag Goose (about 20%) and Mute Swan (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Goldeneye sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Goldeneye is recorded against all the birds logged in Białowieża National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.