What are the chances of seeing a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher in Big Bend National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher sighting in Big Bend National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 222nd most-seen of the 270 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher in Big Bend National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher in Big Bend National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scissor-tailed Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Big Bend National Park the best place to see a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher?
16th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Scissor-tailed Flycatcher sightings, Big Bend National Park ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Everglades National Park (United States, about 20%) and Las Baulas Marine National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Scissor-tailed Flycatcher live in Big Bend National Park?
Same genus: Tyrannus
The closest relatives of the Scissor-tailed Flycatcher that you can see in Big Bend National Park (genus Tyrannus, Kingbirds) are Western Kingbird (about 10%) and Cassin's Kingbird (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scissor-tailed Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scissor-tailed Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Big Bend National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.