What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Belo Horizonte?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting in Belo Horizonte on a given day, based on 116 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 71st most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Belo Horizonte?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Belo Horizonte on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and November–December, the lowest months. That is one of Belo Horizonte's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain against 270 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Belo Horizonte the best place to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
4th of 10
Of the 10 cities where we can rate Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings, Belo Horizonte ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Goiânia (Brazil, about 20%), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil, about 10%) and São Paulo (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill live in Belo Horizonte?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill that you can see in Belo Horizonte (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Bananaquit (about 80%), Sayaca Tanager (about 70%) and Saffron Finch (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-vented Conebill is recorded against all the birds logged in Belo Horizonte (116 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.