What are the chances of seeing a Black-rumped Flameback in Chattogram?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-rumped Flameback sighting in Chattogram on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 43rd most-seen of the 76 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-rumped Flameback in Chattogram?
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-rumped Flameback in Chattogram on a given day, against about 10% in February, June and October–December, the lowest months. That is one of Chattogram's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 780 mm in July. April and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Black-rumped Flameback?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-rumped Flameback sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chattogram the best place to see a Black-rumped Flameback?
31st of 57
Of the 57 cities where we can rate Black-rumped Flameback sightings, Chattogram ranks 31st at about 20%. The best odds are in Savar (Bangladesh, about 70%), Tamluk (India, about 60%) and Thiruvananthapuram (India, about 60%).
Which relatives of the Black-rumped Flameback live in Chattogram?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Black-rumped Flameback that you can see in Chattogram (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Streak-throated Woodpecker (about 20%), Eurasian Wryneck (about 10%) and Fulvous-breasted Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-rumped Flameback sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-rumped Flameback is recorded against all the birds logged in Chattogram (14 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.