What are the chances of seeing a Purple-throated Euphonia in Emas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Purple-throated Euphonia sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 24 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 119th most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Purple-throated Euphonia in Emas National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Purple-throated Euphonia in Emas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August, the lowest month. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Purple-throated Euphonia?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Purple-throated Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Purple-throated Euphonia?
12th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Purple-throated Euphonia sightings, Emas National Park ranks 12th at about 10%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 40%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 40%) and Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Purple-throated Euphonia live in Emas National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Purple-throated Euphonia that you can see in Emas National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Curl-crested Jay (about 80%), Black-throated Saltator (about 70%) and Chopí Blackbird (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Purple-throated Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Purple-throated Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (24 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.