What are the chances of seeing a Lanner Falcon in Etosha National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lanner Falcon sighting in Etosha National Park on a given day, based on 146 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 130th most-seen of the 260 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lanner Falcon in Etosha National Park?
February and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lanner Falcon in Etosha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and August–October, the lowest months. Those are among Etosha National Park's wettest months, with about 55 mm of rain a month against almost none in June.
What time of day is best to see a Lanner Falcon?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lanner Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Etosha National Park the best place to see a Lanner Falcon?
3rd of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Lanner Falcon sightings, Etosha National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa, about 50%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Lanner Falcon live in Etosha National Park?
Same genus: Falco
The closest relatives of the Lanner Falcon that you can see in Etosha National Park (genus Falco, Typical Falcons) are Greater Kestrel (about 30%), Red-necked Falcon (about 20%) and Rock Kestrel (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lanner Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lanner Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Etosha National Park (146 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.