What are the chances of seeing a Woodland Kingfisher in Hwange National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Woodland Kingfisher sighting in Hwange National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 238th most-seen of the 308 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Woodland Kingfisher in Hwange National Park?
March, October and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Woodland Kingfisher in Hwange National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Woodland Kingfisher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Woodland Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hwange National Park the best place to see a Woodland Kingfisher?
31st of 35
Of the 35 parks where we can rate Woodland Kingfisher sightings, Hwange National Park ranks 31st at under 5%. The best odds are in Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 70%), Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 60%) and Akagera National Park (Rwanda, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Woodland Kingfisher live in Hwange National Park?
Same genus: Halcyon
The closest relatives of the Woodland Kingfisher that you can see in Hwange National Park (genus Halcyon, Typical Woodland Kingfishers) are Brown-hooded Kingfisher (about 10%) and Striped Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Woodland Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Woodland Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Hwange National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.