What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Woodswallow in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 1,110 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 51st most-seen of the 360 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Woodswallow in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
November
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against about 20% in January–February and May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
3rd of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ashy Woodswallow sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 50%) and Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Black-crested Bulbul (about 70%), White-rumped Shama (about 70%) and Black-naped Monarch (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (1,110 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.