What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Treepie in Keoladeo National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Treepie sighting in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, based on 1,584 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 29th most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Treepie in Keoladeo National Park?
January–March and May
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Treepie in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, against about 40% in August, the lowest month. Those are among Keoladeo National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 240 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Treepie?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Treepie sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Keoladeo National Park the best place to see a Rufous Treepie?
4th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Rufous Treepie sightings, Keoladeo National Park ranks 4th at about 60%. The best odds are in Ranthambore National Park (India, about 80%), Kanha National Park (India, about 70%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Rufous Treepie live in Keoladeo National Park?
Same family: Corvidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Treepie that you can see in Keoladeo National Park (family Corvidae, Crows, Jays, and Magpies) are House Crow (about 40%) and Large-billed Crow (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Treepie sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Treepie is recorded against all the birds logged in Keoladeo National Park (1,584 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.