What are the chances of seeing a Gabar Goshawk in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Gabar Goshawk sighting in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park on a given day, based on 184 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 34th most-seen of the 122 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gabar Goshawk in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park?
June
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Gabar Goshawk in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park on a given day, against about 10% in February, the lowest month. That is one of Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 40 mm in January. May has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Gabar Goshawk?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gabar Goshawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park the best place to see a Gabar Goshawk?
Yes
Of the 43 parks where we can rate Gabar Goshawk sightings, Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%) and Samburu National Reserve (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Gabar Goshawk live in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Gabar Goshawk that you can see in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Pale Chanting Goshawk (about 70%), Tawny Eagle (about 60%) and White-backed Vulture (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gabar Goshawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gabar Goshawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (184 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.