What are the chances of seeing a Blue-eared Kingfisher in Khao Luang National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-eared Kingfisher sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 196th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-eared Kingfisher in Khao Luang National Park?
June and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-eared Kingfisher in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-eared Kingfisher?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-eared Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Blue-eared Kingfisher?
14th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Blue-eared Kingfisher sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary (Malaysia, about 70%), Tanjung Puting National Park (Indonesia, about 60%) and Sepilok (Malaysia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Blue-eared Kingfisher live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-eared Kingfisher that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Rufous-collared Kingfisher (about 30%), Banded Kingfisher (about 20%) and White-throated Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-eared Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-eared Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.