What are the chances of seeing a White-throated Kingfisher in Khao Luang National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-throated Kingfisher sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 87 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 100th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-throated Kingfisher in Khao Luang National Park?
May
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a White-throated Kingfisher in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White-throated Kingfisher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-throated Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a White-throated Kingfisher?
33rd of 37
Of the 37 parks where we can rate White-throated Kingfisher sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 33rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 80%), Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 80%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the White-throated Kingfisher live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the White-throated Kingfisher that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Rufous-collared Kingfisher (about 30%) and Banded Kingfisher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-throated Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-throated Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (87 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.