What are the chances of seeing a Parasitic Jaeger in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Parasitic Jaeger sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 299th most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Parasitic Jaeger in Manuel Antonio National Park?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Parasitic Jaeger in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months. That is one of Manuel Antonio National Park's wettest months, with about 660 mm of rain against 35 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Parasitic Jaeger?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Parasitic Jaeger sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Parasitic Jaeger?
18th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Parasitic Jaeger sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 18th at under 5%. The best odds are in Svalbard (Norway, about 80%), Vatnajokull National Park (Iceland, about 60%) and Bastimentos Island National Marine Park (Panama, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Parasitic Jaeger live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Parasitic Jaeger that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Spotted Sandpiper (about 20%), Northern Jacana (about 20%) and Southern Lapwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Parasitic Jaeger sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Parasitic Jaeger is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.