What are the chances of seeing a Northern Jacana in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Jacana sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 327 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 48th most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Northern Jacana in Manuel Antonio National Park?
April and October
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Jacana in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Northern Jacana?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Northern Jacana sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Northern Jacana?
9th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Northern Jacana sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 9th at about 20%. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 70%), Tortuguero National Park (Costa Rica, about 60%) and Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Northern Jacana live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Northern Jacana that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Spotted Sandpiper (about 20%) and Southern Lapwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Northern Jacana sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Northern Jacana is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (327 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.