What are the chances of seeing a Panama Flycatcher in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Panama Flycatcher sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 234th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Panama Flycatcher in Marino Ballena National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Panama Flycatcher in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Panama Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Panama Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Panama Flycatcher?
13th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Panama Flycatcher sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Coiba National Park (Panama, about 40%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Panama Flycatcher live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same genus: Myiarchus
The closest relatives of the Panama Flycatcher that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (genus Myiarchus, Myiarchus Flycatchers) are Dusky-capped Flycatcher (about 10%) and Great Crested Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Panama Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Panama Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.