What are the chances of seeing an African Stonechat in Mikumi National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an African Stonechat sighting in Mikumi National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 240th most-seen of the 261 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an African Stonechat in Mikumi National Park?
August and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an African Stonechat in Mikumi National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September–October and December–July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an African Stonechat?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most African Stonechat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Mikumi National Park the best place to see an African Stonechat?
27th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate African Stonechat sightings, Mikumi National Park ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Golden Gate Highlands National Park (South Africa, about 70%), Mantadia National Park (Madagascar, about 50%) and Arusha National Park (Tanzania, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the African Stonechat live in Mikumi National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the African Stonechat that you can see in Mikumi National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-headed Black-Chat (about 30%), Collared Palmthrush (about 30%) and Southern Black Flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the African Stonechat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the African Stonechat is recorded against all the birds logged in Mikumi National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.