What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Woodswallow in Minneriya National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow sighting in Minneriya National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 147th most-seen of the 155 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Woodswallow in Minneriya National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow in Minneriya National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Minneriya National Park the best place to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
19th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ashy Woodswallow sightings, Minneriya National Park ranks 19th at under 5%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 50%), Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow live in Minneriya National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow that you can see in Minneriya National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Indian Robin (about 50%), Purple-rumped Sunbird (about 50%) and Black-hooded Oriole (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Minneriya National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.