What are the chances of seeing a Malachite Kingfisher in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Malachite Kingfisher sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 547 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 45th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Malachite Kingfisher in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
December
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Malachite Kingfisher in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, against about 20% in April, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Malachite Kingfisher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Malachite Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Malachite Kingfisher?
6th of 48
Of the 48 parks where we can rate Malachite Kingfisher sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 6th at about 30%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 50%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 40%) and Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Malachite Kingfisher live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Malachite Kingfisher that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Pied Kingfisher (about 50%), Woodland Kingfisher (about 40%) and Gray-headed Kingfisher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Malachite Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Malachite Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (547 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.