What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Woodswallow in Royal Bardia National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow sighting in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 151st most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Woodswallow in Royal Bardia National Park?
April–June and September–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and December–March, the lowest months. August has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Bardia National Park the best place to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
14th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ashy Woodswallow sightings, Royal Bardia National Park ranks 14th at about 10%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 50%), Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow live in Royal Bardia National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow that you can see in Royal Bardia National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Black-hooded Oriole (about 60%), Red-whiskered Bulbul (about 60%) and Rufous Treepie (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Bardia National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.