What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Woodswallow in Udawalawe National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow sighting in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 162nd most-seen of the 166 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Woodswallow in Udawalawe National Park?
December
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Udawalawe National Park the best place to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
20th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ashy Woodswallow sightings, Udawalawe National Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 50%), Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow live in Udawalawe National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow that you can see in Udawalawe National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Indian Robin (about 70%), Yellow-billed Babbler (about 70%) and White-browed Fantail (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Udawalawe National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.