What are the chances of seeing a Gabar Goshawk in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gabar Goshawk sighting in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 112th most-seen of the 118 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gabar Goshawk in Waterberg Plateau Park?
May and November–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gabar Goshawk in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and July–October, the lowest months. April and June have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Gabar Goshawk?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gabar Goshawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Waterberg Plateau Park the best place to see a Gabar Goshawk?
26th of 43
Of the 43 parks where we can rate Gabar Goshawk sightings, Waterberg Plateau Park ranks 26th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa, about 30%), Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%) and Samburu National Reserve (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Gabar Goshawk live in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Gabar Goshawk that you can see in Waterberg Plateau Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Verreaux's Eagle (about 40%), African Hawk-Eagle (about 30%) and Pale Chanting Goshawk (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gabar Goshawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gabar Goshawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Waterberg Plateau Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.