What are the chances of seeing a Tickell's Blue Flycatcher in Yala National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Tickell's Blue Flycatcher sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 182nd most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tickell's Blue Flycatcher in Yala National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Tickell's Blue Flycatcher in Yala National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Tickell's Blue Flycatcher?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tickell's Blue Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Tickell's Blue Flycatcher?
22nd of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Tickell's Blue Flycatcher sightings, Yala National Park ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Gir National Park (India, about 50%), Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 50%) and Mudumalai National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Tickell's Blue Flycatcher live in Yala National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Tickell's Blue Flycatcher that you can see in Yala National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Indian Robin (about 80%), Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 60%) and Asian Brown Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tickell's Blue Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tickell's Blue Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.