What are the chances of seeing a Ruddy Daggerwing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Daggerwing sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 102nd most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruddy Daggerwing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Daggerwing in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and August–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ruddy Daggerwing?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruddy Daggerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Ruddy Daggerwing?
23rd of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Ruddy Daggerwing sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 23rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 20%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ruddy Daggerwing live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same genus: Marpesia
The closest relatives of the Ruddy Daggerwing that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (genus Marpesia, Daggerwings) are Spot-Banded Daggerwing (about 10%) and Orange Daggerwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruddy Daggerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruddy Daggerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.