What are the chances of seeing a Ruddy Daggerwing in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Daggerwing sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 390th most-seen of the 431 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruddy Daggerwing in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
August and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Daggerwing in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September–October and December–July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ruddy Daggerwing?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruddy Daggerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cumbres de Monterrey National Park the best place to see a Ruddy Daggerwing?
25th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Ruddy Daggerwing sightings, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park ranks 25th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 20%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ruddy Daggerwing live in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Ruddy Daggerwing that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Zebra Longwing (about 30%), Monarch (about 30%) and Queen (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruddy Daggerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruddy Daggerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.