What are the chances of seeing a Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike in Khao Luang National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 275 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 34th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike in Khao Luang National Park?
January and October
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against about 30% in February–April, July, September and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike?
Yes
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike sightings, Khao Luang National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Kerinci Seblat National Park (Indonesia, about 30%) and Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same family: Tephrodornithidae
The closest relatives of the Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (family Tephrodornithidae) are Rufous-winged Philentoma (about 20%) and Large Woodshrike (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (275 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.