What are the chances of seeing a Lilac-breasted Roller in Kruger National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Lilac-breasted Roller sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 7,766 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 4th most-seen of the 464 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lilac-breasted Roller in Kruger National Park?
January, April–May and October
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Lilac-breasted Roller in Kruger National Park on a given day, against about 50% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Lilac-breasted Roller?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lilac-breasted Roller sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kruger National Park the best place to see a Lilac-breasted Roller?
9th of 40
Of the 40 parks where we can rate Lilac-breasted Roller sightings, Kruger National Park ranks 9th at about 60%. The best odds are in Tarangire National Park (Tanzania, about 90%), Moremi Game Reserve (Botswana, about 70%) and Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Lilac-breasted Roller live in Kruger National Park?
Same genus: Coracias
The closest relatives of the Lilac-breasted Roller that you can see in Kruger National Park (genus Coracias, Typical Rollers) are European Roller (about 10%) and Rufous-crowned Roller (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lilac-breasted Roller sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lilac-breasted Roller is recorded against all the birds logged in Kruger National Park (7,766 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.