What are the chances of seeing a Tropical Woodskimmer in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tropical Woodskimmer sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 90th most-seen of the 152 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tropical Woodskimmer in Lago de Yojoa?
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Tropical Woodskimmer in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in February–May, July and September–November, the lowest months. That is one of Lago de Yojoa's wettest months, with about 300 mm of rain against 65 mm in April.
What time of day is best to see a Tropical Woodskimmer?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tropical Woodskimmer sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Tropical Woodskimmer?
13th of 20
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Tropical Woodskimmer sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 13th at about 10%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%), Darién National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Tropical Woodskimmer live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Tropical Woodskimmer that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Brown Setwing (about 20%), Red-Mantled Dragonlet (about 20%) and Pin-Tailed Pondhawk (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tropical Woodskimmer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tropical Woodskimmer is recorded against all the insects logged in Lago de Yojoa (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.