What are the chances of seeing a Scarlet-thighed Dacnis in Los Quetzales National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet-thighed Dacnis sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 39 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 171st most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scarlet-thighed Dacnis in Los Quetzales National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet-thighed Dacnis in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Scarlet-thighed Dacnis?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scarlet-thighed Dacnis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Scarlet-thighed Dacnis?
20th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Scarlet-thighed Dacnis sightings, Los Quetzales National Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 20%), Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Scarlet-thighed Dacnis live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Scarlet-thighed Dacnis that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Slaty Flowerpiercer (about 70%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 50%) and Silver-throated Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scarlet-thighed Dacnis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scarlet-thighed Dacnis is recorded against all the birds logged in Los Quetzales National Park (39 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.