What are the chances of seeing a Torrent Tyrannulet in Los Quetzales National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 2,311 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 50th most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Torrent Tyrannulet in Los Quetzales National Park?
January–April, July and November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, against about 20% in May–June, August–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Torrent Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
Yes
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Torrent Tyrannulet sightings, Los Quetzales National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Volcán Barú National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Mountain Elaenia (about 50%), Tufted Flycatcher (about 30%) and Black-capped Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Torrent Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Torrent Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Los Quetzales National Park (2,311 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.