What are the chances of seeing a Black Phoebe in Los Quetzales National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 746 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Phoebe in Los Quetzales National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black Phoebe?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Phoebe sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Black Phoebe?
25th of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Black Phoebe sightings, Los Quetzales National Park ranks 25th at about 10%. The best odds are in Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 70%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 60%) and Death Valley National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Phoebe live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Black Phoebe that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Mountain Elaenia (about 50%), Tufted Flycatcher (about 30%) and Black-capped Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Phoebe sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Phoebe is recorded against all the birds logged in Los Quetzales National Park (746 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.