What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Woodswallow in Manas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 323 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 79th most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Woodswallow in Manas National Park?
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow in Manas National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March, August and October, the lowest months. That is one of Manas National Park's wettest months, with about 500 mm of rain against 10 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
5th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ashy Woodswallow sightings, Manas National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 50%), Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow live in Manas National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow that you can see in Manas National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Jungle Myna (about 50%), Black Drongo (about 50%) and Siberian Stonechat (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (323 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.