What are the chances of seeing a Black Swift in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Swift sighting in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 296th most-seen of the 329 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Swift in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge?
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Swift in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge on a given day, against under 5% in June to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black Swift?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge the best place to see a Black Swift?
14th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Black Swift sightings, Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 10%), Jasper National Park (Canada, about 10%) and Glacier National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black Swift live in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Black Swift that you can see in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge (family Apodidae, Swifts) are Gray-rumped Swift (about 10%), White-collared Swift (about 10%) and Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.