What are the chances of seeing an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 208th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Marino Ballena National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Eye-ringed Flatbill in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see an Eye-ringed Flatbill?
20th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Eye-ringed Flatbill sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 30%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Eye-ringed Flatbill that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 80%), Tropical Kingbird (about 70%) and Social Flycatcher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eye-ringed Flatbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eye-ringed Flatbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.