What are the chances of seeing a Ruddy Daggerwing in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Daggerwing sighting in Ostional Wildlife Refuge on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 19th most-seen of the 47 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruddy Daggerwing in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
May
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Daggerwing in Ostional Wildlife Refuge on a given day, against under 5% in June and August–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ruddy Daggerwing?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruddy Daggerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ostional Wildlife Refuge the best place to see a Ruddy Daggerwing?
Among the best
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Ruddy Daggerwing sightings, Ostional Wildlife Refuge ranks 7th at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 20%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ruddy Daggerwing live in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Ruddy Daggerwing that you can see in Ostional Wildlife Refuge (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 60%), Malachite (about 40%) and Gulf Fritillary (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruddy Daggerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruddy Daggerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Ostional Wildlife Refuge (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.