What are the chances of seeing a Gabar Goshawk in Pilanesberg National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gabar Goshawk sighting in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, based on 52 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 134th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gabar Goshawk in Pilanesberg National Park?
March–October and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gabar Goshawk in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Gabar Goshawk?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gabar Goshawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pilanesberg National Park the best place to see a Gabar Goshawk?
12th of 43
Of the 43 parks where we can rate Gabar Goshawk sightings, Pilanesberg National Park ranks 12th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa, about 30%), Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%) and Samburu National Reserve (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Gabar Goshawk live in Pilanesberg National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Gabar Goshawk that you can see in Pilanesberg National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Black-winged Kite (about 40%), African Fish-Eagle (about 30%) and Common Buzzard (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gabar Goshawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gabar Goshawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Pilanesberg National Park (52 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.