What are the chances of seeing a Slaty-capped Flycatcher in Poás Volcano National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Slaty-capped Flycatcher sighting in Poás Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 305th most-seen of the 356 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Slaty-capped Flycatcher in Poás Volcano National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Slaty-capped Flycatcher in Poás Volcano National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Slaty-capped Flycatcher?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Slaty-capped Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Poás Volcano National Park the best place to see a Slaty-capped Flycatcher?
19th of 20
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Slaty-capped Flycatcher sightings, Poás Volcano National Park ranks 19th at under 5%. The best odds are in Henri Pittier National Park (Venezuela, about 20%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 20%) and Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Slaty-capped Flycatcher live in Poás Volcano National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Slaty-capped Flycatcher that you can see in Poás Volcano National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 20%), Mountain Elaenia (about 20%) and Great Kiskadee (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Slaty-capped Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Slaty-capped Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Poás Volcano National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.