What are the chances of seeing a Piratic Flycatcher in Poás Volcano National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher sighting in Poás Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 123 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 114th most-seen of the 356 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Piratic Flycatcher in Poás Volcano National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher in Poás Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Piratic Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Poás Volcano National Park the best place to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
41st of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Piratic Flycatcher sightings, Poás Volcano National Park ranks 41st at under 5%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher live in Poás Volcano National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher that you can see in Poás Volcano National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 20%), Mountain Elaenia (about 20%) and Great Kiskadee (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Piratic Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Piratic Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Poás Volcano National Park (123 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.