What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Woodswallow in Sinharaja Forest Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow sighting in Sinharaja Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 120th most-seen of the 156 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Woodswallow in Sinharaja Forest Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow in Sinharaja Forest Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sinharaja Forest Reserve the best place to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
16th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ashy Woodswallow sightings, Sinharaja Forest Reserve ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 50%), Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow live in Sinharaja Forest Reserve?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow that you can see in Sinharaja Forest Reserve (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Square-tailed Bulbul (about 80%), Yellow-Browed Bulbul (about 70%) and Orange-billed Babbler (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Sinharaja Forest Reserve (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.