What are the chances of seeing a Black Swift in Tortuguero National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Swift sighting in Tortuguero National Park on a given day, based on 44 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 225th most-seen of the 348 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Swift in Tortuguero National Park?
June and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Swift in Tortuguero National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months. Those are among Tortuguero National Park's wettest months, with about 500 mm of rain a month against 160 mm in March.
What time of day is best to see a Black Swift?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tortuguero National Park the best place to see a Black Swift?
9th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Black Swift sightings, Tortuguero National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 10%), Jasper National Park (Canada, about 10%) and Glacier National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black Swift live in Tortuguero National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Black Swift that you can see in Tortuguero National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are Gray-rumped Swift (about 20%) and White-collared Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Tortuguero National Park (44 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.