What are the chances of seeing a Pacific Golden-Plover in Wilpattu National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific Golden-Plover sighting in Wilpattu National Park on a given day, based on 162 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 52nd most-seen of the 169 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pacific Golden-Plover in Wilpattu National Park?
November
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific Golden-Plover in Wilpattu National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June to August, the lowest months. That is one of Wilpattu National Park's wettest months, with about 320 mm of rain against 40 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Pacific Golden-Plover?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pacific Golden-Plover sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Wilpattu National Park the best place to see a Pacific Golden-Plover?
Yes
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Pacific Golden-Plover sightings, Wilpattu National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%) and Raja Ampat (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Pacific Golden-Plover live in Wilpattu National Park?
Same family: Charadriidae
The closest relatives of the Pacific Golden-Plover that you can see in Wilpattu National Park (family Charadriidae, Plovers and Lapwings) are Red-wattled Lapwing (about 80%), Yellow-wattled Lapwing (about 10%) and Kentish Plover (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pacific Golden-Plover sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pacific Golden-Plover is recorded against all the birds logged in Wilpattu National Park (162 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.