What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Mourner in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Mourner sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 1,061 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 166th most-seen of the 503 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Mourner in Arenal Volcano National Park?
February to October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Mourner in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Mourner?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Mourner sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Rufous Mourner?
Among the best
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Rufous Mourner sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 9th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%), Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%) and Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Mourner live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Mourner that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 70%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Mourner sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Mourner is recorded against all the birds logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (1,061 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.